India's rooftop solar rules are stated to commence on 1 October, and the final text is still not public
One clause decides more about household solar economics than the whole of the PM Surya Ghar publicity: a state commission would be able to attach a charge to any rooftop system above 5 kW, which is a large house rather than an industrial estate. The threshold draws a line between a household that generates for itself, which stays subsidised, and one that generates enough to matter to the grid, which becomes chargeable. The stated basis, storage costs and network losses, is a real argument rather than a revenue grab, but the draft does not say whose storage, valued how, or whether the same logic is applied to the utility. The second thing is the silence: rules that reprice every rooftop in the country are due in nine days with no public final text, so installers are quoting paybacks that depend on a charge which may or may not exist, and the cost of that uncertainty falls on the smallest party in the transaction.
India's rooftop solar rules commence on 1 October. The text is still not public
The Ministry of Power's draft would let state commissions attach a charge to any rooftop system above 5 kW. Nine days before the stated commencement date, no final notification has been traced.
The Ministry of Power issued the draft Electricity (Rights of Consumers) Amendment Rules, 2026 on 12 March 2026, invited comments until 11 April, and wrote into the draft that most of its provisions would come into force on 1 October 2026. That date is now nine days away. Searches on 22 September 2026 surfaced no notification of the final rules, and no trade coverage of one. The ministry's own PDF of the draft, at the address still indexed by search, returned HTTP 404 when fetched on 22 September 2026. [UNVERIFIED: whether final rules have been notified. This is an absence of evidence from search rather than a confirmed negative; the Gazette of India was not read directly.]
What the draft does
The rooftop clause is the one that matters. Where a state commission has not made its own regulations, the draft permits net metering up to 500 kW or the consumer's sanctioned load, whichever is lower. Above that, systems may be pushed to other settlement arrangements. Separately, and this is the live provision, systems above 5 kW may attract net-metering charges based on storage costs and network losses. Installations above 500 kW may be required to fit energy storage.
The draft also introduces a formal demand response framework, under which state commissions would set eligibility criteria for demand response providers, incentives for participating consumers, communication protocols, and procedures for measurement, verification and financial settlement. Time-of-day tariffs become mandatory for commercial and industrial consumers with demand above 10 kW from 1 April 2027, and for other categories except agriculture from 1 April 2028, contingent on smart meter deployment. Trade coverage of the draft reports that electricity during an eight-hour solar window, to be set by each state commission, must be priced at least 20 percent cheaper than normal rates, with peak-hour electricity at 1.10 to 1.20 times the regular tariff. [UNVERIFIED: the solar-window discount and the peak multiplier are reported by trade press summarising the draft; the clause text was not read.]
The rest is consumer-service plumbing, and it is genuinely useful. New connections in three days in metropolitan and municipal corporation areas, seven in other municipal areas, fifteen in rural areas and thirty in hilly rural areas. Consumption more than five times, or less than one-fifth of, the average of the preceding six billing cycles triggers a mandatory thirty-day review, during which the distribution licensee may not disconnect a consumer who keeps paying at the average. Grievance forums are restructured into two tiers, at company level and at district or municipality level.
Why it matters
One clause here decides more about household solar economics than the whole of PM Surya Ghar's publicity. A state commission would be able to attach a charge to any rooftop system above 5 kW, priced off storage costs and network losses. Five kilowatts is a large house, not an industrial estate, and the effect of the threshold is to draw a line between a household that generates for itself and a household that generates enough to matter to the grid. The first is subsidised. The second becomes chargeable.
The stated basis for the charge is worth sitting with, because it is a genuine argument rather than a revenue grab. A rooftop exporter pushes power onto a network at midday that the network did not ask for and must absorb, and somebody pays for the storage and the losses that absorption implies. The question the draft does not answer is whose storage, valued how, and whether the same logic is applied to the DISCOM's own procurement. Until the final text is public, that is unknowable, and it is the difference between a cost-reflective charge and a tariff barrier wearing one's clothes.
The second thing worth watching is the silence. Rules that reprice every rooftop in the country are stated to commence in nine days and the final text is not public. Installers are quoting systems whose payback depends on a charge that may or may not exist. DISCOMs are planning for a demand response framework they have not seen. State commissions are being handed a discretion whose boundaries they cannot read. Whatever the final rules say, arriving this late is itself a decision, and it falls hardest on the smallest party in the transaction.
What is still unknown
Whether the final rules have been notified, and if not, whether the 1 October commencement survives into them. How many comments were received by 11 April 2026, and whether they were published. What the intended basis is for a net-metering charge computed from storage costs. Whether the 5 kW threshold interacts with the PM Surya Ghar subsidy tiers, which centre on systems of 1 kW to 3 kW. And whether "may allow" leaves each state commission free to charge nothing, which would make the national clause a permission rather than an instruction, and the real story a state-by-state one.
Sources
- Ministry of Power, draft Electricity (Rights of Consumers) Amendment Rules, 2026: https://powermin.gov.in/sites/default/files/webform/notices/Seeking_comments_on_Draft_Electricity_Rights_of_Consumers_Amendment_Rules_2026.pdf (HTTP 404 on 22 September 2026)
- Energetica India, 14 March 2026: https://www.energetica-india.net/news/mop-releases-draft-electricity-consumer-rights-rules-2026-proposes-demand-response-tod-tariffs
- SolarQuarter, 14 March 2026: https://solarquarter.com/2026/03/14/ministry-of-power-proposes-electricity-consumer-rights-amendment-rules-2026-to-introduce-demand-response-time-of-day-tariffs-and-stronger-billing-protection/
- Indian Infrastructure, 17 March 2026: https://indianinfrastructure.com/2026/03/17/ministry-of-power-issues-draft-electricity-rights-of-consumers-amendment-rules-2026/
- RESI India analysis of the storage mandate: https://www.resiindia.org/post/draft-electricity-rights-of-consumers-amendment-rules-2026-enabling-mandated-bess-for-500-kw-so
Public comments
Loading…